home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Columbia Kermit / kermit.zip / newsgroups / misc.19970626-19970929 / 000264_news@newsmaster….columbia.edu _Sat Aug 30 05:23:44 1997.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  2020-01-01  |  2KB

  1. Return-Path: <news@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu>
  2. Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.35.30])
  3.     by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA04449
  4.     for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Sat, 30 Aug 1997 05:23:43 -0400 (EDT)
  5. Received: (from news@localhost)
  6.     by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA29389
  7.     for kermit.misc@watsun; Sat, 30 Aug 1997 05:23:43 -0400 (EDT)
  8. Path: news.columbia.edu!panix!howland.erols.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.Stanford.EDU!nntp.Stanford.EDU!Cup.DSG.Stanford.EDU!jonathan
  9. From: jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan Stone)
  10. Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.ultrix,comp.unix.shell
  11. Subject: Re: Do not get connected at 33.6K
  12. Date: 30 Aug 1997 09:17:55 GMT
  13. Organization: Stanford Distributed Systems Group
  14. Lines: 16
  15. Sender: jonathan@Cup.DSG.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan Stone)
  16. Message-ID: <5u8og3$1ff$1@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
  17. References: <5tsn5b$o9q@newslink.runet.edu> <5tupoe$gra$1@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <5u0g7d$f6o@newslink.runet.edu> <5u1fh6$n39$1@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <5u1mrf$il7@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu> <5u289d$3qi$1@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <5u2qoj$rg6@newslink.runet.edu>
  18. Reply-To: jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU
  19. NNTP-Posting-Host: cup.dsg.stanford.edu
  20. To: ibelooze@runet.edu (I l y a)
  21. Xref: news.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:7581 comp.unix.questions:116190 comp.unix.admin:70342 comp.unix.misc:35315 comp.unix.ultrix:31810 comp.unix.shell:54386
  22.  
  23. In article <5u2qoj$rg6@newslink.runet.edu>, ibelooze@runet.edu (I l y a) writes:
  24. > Jonathan Stone (jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU) wrote:
  25. > : However -- I suspect that the original poster has a
  26. > : 5000/{20,25,33,50}, 5000/{120,125,133,150}, or a 5000/{240,260}.
  27. >   
  28. >   That is correct, 5000/20, Ultrix 4.4. Thanks for the nice theoretical
  29. >   discussion, but I just want to get have normal, not messed up screen at
  30. >   38400 speeds and I would like to know the simplest way to do get that.
  31. >   Like, step 1, step 2, step 3. It seems like a simple flow of control
  32. >   problem.
  33.  
  34. I could, but step 0 would be:
  35.  
  36.     0) Install NetBSD
  37.  
  38. which might not be satisfactory.